Bravo, Sarah Palin!

.
In Governor Sarah Palin's resignation statement, she said that frivolous lawsuits and stupid attacks are costing Alaska huge amounts of money as well as administration time and energy.

Knowing that she and her staff had already accomplished most of the goals they had set out to accomplish, and not wanting to further burden Alaska with the cost of idiotic attacks directed at her and her family, she bravely made the right decision and stepped down.

Now, she is free to speak as she needs to without concern that senseless new attacks will cost Alaskan taxpayers more. No more will the idiots be able to use the Governor's office as leverage to try to stop her.

As she said, no more politics as usual. This move was brilliant in that it snatched from the jerks their ability to mess with her via empty ethics complaints. I bet that left them pretty surprised. Now all they're left to attack with is 'name calling.''

Neither Sarah Palin nor the people that love and support her will disappear into the night. What many on the left, and even in McCain's slimy camp, forget is that half of America really does support her.

It doesn't matter to me whether or not she runs for President. That's not the point, and I don't believe that was the point of her resignation. Sarah has always been straight forward. She's never hidden her thoughts and plans. That's the reason so many on the left have chosen to dislike her. (Including the slobs who ran McCain's campaign). I believe what she said in her statement was very well said, and exactly what she meant. Which is why so many of the rest of have chosen to love her.

Having made the courageous decision she has made, she has only made us love her more. Sarah Palin - we're behind you, and we desperately need many more like you. May God Bless you and your family in whatever path you take over the next few years.

.

Palin VS. Letterman; Have People Finally Woken Up?

.
The most amazing thing to me about this interchange is that up until now, Letterman has been getting away his with nasty, bitter vitriol toward Palin and other conservatives. He's been able to say pretty much whatever he wanted and no one has called him onto the carpet prior to this.

All the way back in October 2008, it was considered OK by the left to call Governor Palin anything you wanted. Swear at her, mock her, judge her hair, her ideas, her husband and her children. Slander her church, ridicule Alaska, call her supporters white trash. Accuse her husband of incest, tell everyone she is an unfit mother, make sexual innuendos about her and her family, paste photo-shopped porn images all over the internet.

So it must have come as just as much a shock to Letterman as to the rest of us that people actually reacted this time. What brought on the double standard?

Hopefully it has to do with people finally waking up. Obama has been in office for five months now, and in that time he has done a litany of horrible things. I hope that what we are seeing now is a large number of people rethinking all that happened during the 2008 campaign and realizing that they were wrong.
.

Obama is "God" according to Newsweek Editor

.
President Obama is "God," according to Newsweek editor Evan Thomas.

“In a way,” Thomas told Chris Matthews during a taping of Hardball, “Obama is standing above the country. Above … above the world …“He’s sort of God.”

Matthews appeared to agree.

Have you ever heard anything so stupid?

And while it's disturbing enough to know that there is probably at least a dozen more that agree with him, what's even more disconcerting is remembering various times throughout history when a man was worshipped as God, only to turn around and seriously hurt the very people that worshipped him.
.

Obama's Double Standard re: Muslims vs. Israel

.
President Obama, putting his own popularity over the best interest of United States citizens, has run around the World apologizing for what he claims are America's arrogant, aggressive and selfish actions.

Two months ago, President Obama apologized to the Turks for the tense relationship during the Bush administration. It seems that Obama feels we owe the world an apology for putting our nose where it doesn't belong.

However, while speaking in Cairo, the ever arrogant president Obama proceeded to dirty his nose by telling Israel what to do. He said, "For more than sixty years they (Palestinians) have endured the pain of dislocation...They endure the daily humiliations...that come with occupation. So let there be no doubt...The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements. This construction violates previous agreements and undermines efforts to achieve peace. It is time for these settlements to stop."

First off, there has never been a country called Palestine. Israel does not occupy their land. The Palestinians have made several agreements with Israel through the decades.

Obama apologized to the Muslim world for what he claims has been America's arrogant micro-management. In the meantime, he tells Israel what they can and can't do.

And what are the examples of America's arrogance, aggression, and selfishness?

To put things into perspective, let's highlight some areas where the U.S. has been involved over the last few decades. How about when we aided and defended allies in two World Wars, or sent billions of dollars in international aide to needy countries - regardless of race or religion? Then there was the assistance to South Korea in their time of need, economic assistance to Eastern Europe after the Soviet Union collapsed, liberating Kuwait in Operation Desert Storm, tripling aide to Africa, providing over $350 million to help Tsunami victims in 2004, aide to earthquake victims in Pakistan, India, China and even Iran, and then drawing attention to Darfur. Yup, if the U.S. kept its nose out of everyone's business, the world would be different.
.

Hugo Chavez says Obama more Liberal than HE is.

.
On June 2, 2009, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez stated, "Hey, Obama has just nationalized nothing more and nothing less than General Motors. Comrade Obama! Fidel, careful, or we are just going to end up to his right."

Nuff said.

Hey, where are all those trolls that were claiming just 8 months ago that we were alarmists? Hey "John," the guy that claimed he was some great businessman, you still out there? No comment? I didn't think so.

Sure hope all those smart libs that voted this child into office have a plan for how to fix things now.
.

What's Obama Thinking?

.
According to the Associated press, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has said that the U.S. is "deeply hated" in the Middle East and Israel is a "cancerous tumor in the heart" of the Muslim world.

According to a Reuters report, Khamenei said the hatred toward Americans could not be changed with "slogans." "The nations of this part of the world ... deeply hate America." "Even if they give sweet and beautiful (speeches) to the Muslim nation ... that will not create change." "Action is needed."

The Mid-east hates America. But Obama figures he can go over there and tell them that he's a Muslim and everything will change. But they've said repeatedly that speaches alone won't convince them. So what is Obama planning on doing? What kind of action will he take - what kind of changes will he force upon Americans - in order to please the people that hate us? And what makes him truly believe that even with those actions, those that hate us will change their minds and suddenly we will have complete world peace?

Obama bin Laden wrote several years ago that unless America becomes a Muslim state, there will be no peace. So what is President Obama thinking as he grovels at their feet?

Stand up, Sir, and be a man! You don't even understand America if you think that what you are doing and saying reflects and represents the thoughts and feelings of most Americans. More importantly, you could very well be bringing us closer to war rather than farther away, because the "actions" they are looking for aren't going to happen, the promises you are making will not manifest, and you are making us appear weak
.

Obama Admin looks the other way as North Korea shoots off Nuclear Missiles

.
By Friday North Korea had conducted its 6th short range missile test since doing a nuclear test last Monday. It has also renounced it's truce with South Korea - the one that has kept peace since the Korean War ended in 1953.

Over half the Chinese fishing boats, which had been in the area earlier in the week for crabbing season, have left without finishing the season.

But U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates told reporters on Friday, "I don't think that anybody in the (Obama) administration thinks there is a crisis."

Obama Admin looks the other way after Black Panthers intimidate Voters

.
FOX News reports that "Charges brought against three members of the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense under the Bush administration have been dropped by the Obama Justice Department."

Minister King Samir Shabazz, Malik Zulu Shabazz and Jerry Jackson were charged after an incident in Philadelphia on Election Day 2008, where they had threatened voters, hurled racial slurs. and blocked poll and campaign workers. Prosecutors said Shabazz held a nightstick or baton and pointed it at people and tapped it.

Bartle Bull, who was a 1960's civil rights lawyer as well as a campaign manager for Robert Kennedy, said it was the most blatant form of voter intimidation he had ever seen. He wrote in an affidavit obtained by FOX News, "I watched the two uniformed men confront voters and attempt to intimidate voters. They were positioned in a location that forced every voter to pass in close proximity to them. The weapon was openly displayed and brandished in plain sight of voters." He also said that they tried to "interfere with the work of other poll observers ... whom the uniformed men apparently believed did not share their preferences politically," and one turned toward white poll observers and said "you are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker."

The wimp Obama Department of Justice told FOX News that they had obtained "an injunction that prohibits the defendant who brandished a weapon outside a Philadelphia polling place from doing so again." Claims were dismissed against the other defendants. Oooh. That was a harsh wrist slap. Well, as long as they were there to support him and keep other voters away, all's good. Let's dismiss all those nasty accusations against the Acorn crew as well.

One has to wonder how the Obama administration would have handled it had it been white Supremists doing the same thing.

Further, now that Obama and followers have gotten away with it this time - what will the next election be like? I can only guess that it will be worse.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/elections/2009/05/29/charges-black-panthers-dropped-obama/
.

Sonia Sotomayor and “Making Policy”

.

May 27th, 2009 by Rob Natelson

.
"Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor’s comment at Duke Law School that the U.S. Court of Appeals “makes policy” has received a lot of attention, and deservedly so. Understanding what prompted her remark is key to understanding what has happened to our Constitution in the modern era" Read more...

.

Blackwell: Obama Divides to Conquer

.
May 14th, 2009 4:53 PM Eastern
KEN BLACKWELL: Why Is Obama Going to Notre Dame? To Divide and Conquer American Catholics

Many ask why Notre Dame would invite President Obama to speak at their graduation. Ken Blackwell, former vice president of Xavier University (a Jesuit institution) and presently a fellow at the Family Research Council in Washington, D.C., asks why Notre Dame extended the invitation to a pro-abortion president in the first place.

He reports that Fr. James Schall, a highly respected professor at Georgetown University, (another Jesuit institution) offered this judgment on a Catholic Web site.

"So when President Obama goes to Notre Dame this week, we should be sure what is at issue. He goes there for one reason, namely, in this symbolic place, to convince the vast majority of Catholics that his operative definition of “human rights,” not that of the Church, is the correct one.

“Rights” mean precisely what the government defines them to mean. The president is the government."

Blackwell states that if we define human rights in these terms, they are no longer inalienable rights, "They become through intellectual sophistry alienable by government edict."

Our president wants the government to run all health care in America - but he and his group don't recognize the human right to life. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of HHS and self-described Catholic, says inalienable rights do not apply in utero. She is in charge of the health care of millions of Americans whose right to life can be taken away through government’s decisions to fund or not fund certain medical care. When Congress passes the new health care bill, she and Obama will even more say in our right to health care.

Another reason Blackwell sees for President Obama going to Notre Dame is to divide and conquer. Look at the debate currently going on within the Catholic community over his speaking at the Notre Dame granduation. Catholics against Catholics, and Obama seems to be enjoying every minute of it. Blackwell notes that Catholic intellectuals, even law professors, are publicly hailing Obama as a way to get past the “toxic debate” on human life. Why do they see the standing up for human lives as a "toxic debate" that must be gotten past by - gotten past by submitting in defeat to the side that condones the killing?

Divide and Conquer. Look around, Obama has been doing that within many groups. But ram-rodding the opposition isn't the way to bring people together and make us all "one" as he likes to pretend. It may have the temporary appearance of having solved the debate, but people of conscience and conviction aren't going to just roll over and go away. We may be in shock right now, but we aren't going to quit on what we know to be true and right.

Obama is exporting abortion around the world, has slashed funding for abstinence education, and intends to strip doctors and nurses of their right to not take part in abortion. I used to be a nurse. I will never return to nursing if it would mean being forced to participate in abortions. I know many in the health care field that will resign rather than be forced to murder. This debate is not over. It will never be over.

When Obama is through, this country will be more divided than it has ever been. I pray it won't be divided to point of destruction. But I'm guessing that there is no turning back. We are two different people's, the extreme liberals and the extreme conservatives, and our visions for the nation are polar. On many of the issues dividing us, there simply isn't any room for compromise. Obama, Ayers, and the rest of their buddies already know that. That's why twenty years ago, Ayers and his friends were talking about what to do with people like us - the unrepentant conservatives.
.

Did Perez Purposely Set Miss California Up with Gay Question?

.
Carrie Prejean, Miss California USA, while competing for the Miss USA crown, answered a question honestly. By doing that, royally ticked off the Miss California USA Directors and many others and might have thrown the contest. Did Perez Hilton, asking this stupid question, purposely cost her the Miss USA title?

Pageant judge and blogger, Perez Hilton, posed the following question to her: “Vermont recently became the 4th state to legalize same-sex marriage. Do you think every state should follow suit. Why or why not?”

Prejean answered, “Well, I think it’s great that Americans are able to choose one or the other. We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage. And you know what, in my country, in my family, I think that I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman. No offense to anybody out there, but that’s how I was raised and that’s how I think it should be between a man and a woman. Thank you very much.”

Gay advocates in the crowd made sure people knew they were offended. A Miss California director Keith Lewis is quoted in a statement as saying, "As co-director of the Miss California USA, I am personally saddened and hurt that Miss California believes marriage rights belong only to a man and a woman." "I believe all religions should be able to ordain what unions they see fit. I do not believe our government should be able to discriminate against anyone and religious beliefs have no politics in the Miss California family." His felllow co-director, Shanna Moakler, agreed.

Excuse me? If the Pageant organizers don't want politics or religion in the pageant, they shouldn't have allowed such a politically charged question. It's not Prejean's fault The question was asked. It's the pageant's fault for having allowed the question. I applaud her for an honest answer.

Then there was Scott Ihrig, a gay man who attended the pageant with his partner and was shouting in the lobby afterwards. "It's ugly," he said. "I think it's ridiculous that she got first runner-up. That is not the value of 95 percent of the people in this audience. Look around this audience and tell me how many gay men there are."

Wake up, Scott. Miss California represents California, not the pageant audience. Most of the people in California do not support gay marriage. That's why gay marriage lost at the polls, remember? If the pageant organizers don't want honest answers, they shouldn't ask questions. In my mind, Miss California should have won due to her courage and conviction.

But Scott's statement begs additional questions. What qualified a gay blogger to judge the Miss USA contest? And why WERE lots of gays attending the event? I guess many of us don't pay as much attention to pageants as others do. There are many more important things to do - and more important issues to pay attention to. Economy, Iraq, world hunger...to name a few.

But if you can't win at the California polls...cause controversy at televised events in order to give the appearance of populous angst.

You don't think so? What kinds of questions did the other contestant get? Were their questions equally politically charged? If not, was it a fair contest? Why was Miss California targeted with this particular question? Did Hilton know her background and how she would answer?

Be on the look out for this type of gimmick to happen again and again.
.

Obama Won't be Upstaged By That Silly Jesus

.
It seems that Obama, who claims to be a Christian, is ashamed of the Gospel. He didn't want to appear on TV surrounded by Christian symbols, and worse, a symbol of Jesus Christ's name. Maybe he thought all his non-Christian supporters would be offended. Maybe he thought his new buddies in the Middle East would be offended. At any rate, it wasn't important whether other Christians were offended, or worse, the Lord himself.

Either Obama was ashamed of the Gospel, or "The One" didn't want to have to compete with the True Lord for attention. All eyes and homage needed to be on Obama.

Whatever the reason, on Tuesday, April 14, Georgetown, a Christian University founded in 1789 by the Jesuits, hid the inscription "IHS" at the request of President Obama's staff. "IHS" is short for Iesous Christos - the Greek name of Jesus Christ.

According to Fox News, White House staff asked the school to cover up all religious symbols and signs while the president was on stage. Apparently, they didn't want Jesus' name to show up on TV during his speech. The monogram, which is normally above the Gaston Hall stage, was covered over with what Fox News said appeared to be black wood during the speech.

The White House said that the backdrop, which included blue drapes and American flags, was standard during policy speeches and other events. They insisted that the move was made only to provide a proper setting for the speech -- and said that "any suggestions to the contrary are simply false."

I have to wonder why the founding Jesuits made the decision to decorate the Hall as they had. Do you suppose they put it there during all events, over the head of all speakers, for the very purpose of continutally reminding all those in the hall that Jesus is Lord and the most important factor in all we think do and say? How would the founding Jesuits have felt about the hiding of Jesus Christ's name?

Many a foolish king has decided he's more important than God. If Obama is a Christian, surely he has read and understands the spiritual consequences of pushing God aside in order to puff himself up.
.

Loser McCain's Top Strategist Still Trying to Give Advice

.
Steve Schmidt, Senator McCain's top adviser from the presidential campaign, is still a loser and still giving loser advice. On Friday he told Republicans to ditch Religion and support same-sex marriage.

At a Log Cabin Republican Convention in Washington DC, he urged Republicans to support civil unions. "If you put public policy issues to a religious test, you risk becoming a religious party," he said. "And in a free country a political party cannot be viable in the long-term if it is seen as a sectarian party." "If the party is seen as anti-gay, then that is injurious to its candidates" in Democrat-leaning and competitive states, he said.

In other words, all that matters is the survival of the Party itself. What it stands for, the principals it holds, are irrelevant. Winning and keeping power are all that matters.

My quesion is, if what a Party stands for doesn't matter or is fluid to the times, than what is the point of being a member of that Party? If the only reason for being a member of a Party is to be on a "team" that works together to gain control of the power in the community, than I suppose what he said makes sense. But most of us choose a party that best reflects our beliefs out of a hope that it's candidates will support those beliefs while in office. We're not trying to get "just anyone" elected. We're trying to get someone that REPRESENTS us elected.

This "strategist" for McCain obviously missed that point during the Presidential campaign and is still missing it. He thinks that for many of us, the social issues are of equal or less importance than the economic issues. Therefore, in the hope of obtaining our economic goals, we should have no problem letting go of what we believe is socially important.

That's obviously how he advised McCain during the campaign. That's why McCain's team marginalized all that Sarah Palin stood for. And that's why so many conservatives couldn't stand McCain.

What a dunce.

He and his fellow jerks, those that are currently in control of the Party, may very well win their way and get the Party to wimp out on what it has stood for for so long. But in doing do, they will lose millions of conservative voters, who will simply walk away to find candidates that are willing to stand for the social issues we care about. We have no interest in supporting Steve Schmidt, Senator McCain, or any of their ilk. They can have the Republican Party if they really want it. Many of us are already so fed up with it we're actively searching for a new, better, third party. Maybe it will be the Tea Party.
.

.

CNN, MSNBC, Mock Tea Parties with Lewd Jokes

.
According to reports, MSNBC's David Shuster lewdly mocked hundreds of thousands of Americans Monday while filling in for fellow jerk, Keith Olbermann.

The Tea Party protests, he said, amounted to "Teabagging day for the right wing and they are going nuts for it." He described the parties as "full-throated" and "toothless." He even said, "They want to give President Obama a strong tongue-lashing and lick government spending" and protesters "whipped out" the demonstrations this past weekend.

Other gross commentators included CNN's Anderson Cooper, analyst David Gergen, MSNBC's Rachel Maddow, and Air America's Ana Marie Cox.

Their disrespect is Unbelievable. What's wrong with these people? Do they forget that half of America votes conservative? How can they continue to mock us like this, and yet expect to be listened to and respected? The only thing I can figure is that they really do believe that the media has huge control over people. They truly believe that conservative believe as they do because Limbaugh tells them to, and if they can be a little more clever than Limbaugh, Americans will start to like and believe them instead. They really don't understand that the reason we like Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and others isn't because they are telling us what to think, but because they are saying what WE ALREADY think. And no, it doesn't matter how clever jerks like Shuster and Olbermann think they are. We won't ever like them.
.

McCain Snubs Palin on Jay Leno

.
Can you Beleive it? Mr. Spineless, the guy that slithered his way through his Presidential Campaign, gave Leno a list of Governors he considered "young and dynamic" as leaders of the Republican Party and left Sarah Palin off the list. Excuse me? She is the only reason I voted that ticket. McCain has never impressed me as someone that could be depended on.

He's the one that chose her for vice president. I had never heard of her prior to the Republican Convention. He's the one that brought her forward so we could all hear her. Many of us fell in love with her practical, conservative beliefs right away. Again, I was going to go ahead and vote Ron Paul, except that she stepped into the picture. A large number of people voted for her, not him. She's the only reason he didn't lose by a landslide.

Now, for some reason, she's not good enough for him. Jerk.

If Republican Party leaders continue to jealously diss her, maybe we'll have to ask her to lead the new Tea Party.
.